<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>JOSEPH MAKHANYE,JABULANE MAKHANYE</names>
	<case>AC/96/0284</case>
	<matter>AM 3834/6,AM 3835/96</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=58961&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/1999/ac990284.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="15">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_____________________                                                        </text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Both Applicants apply for amnesty in respect of the killing of a policeman, Mr Ernest Mfanayedwa Manana (herinafter referred to as &quot;the deceased&quot;) at the Easy by Night Tavern in Sivukile, Morgenzon on the 4th May 1990.  The Applicants were both convicted on a charge of murder on 31 January 1992 and each sentenced to a term of 12 years imprisonment which sentences the Applicants are still serving.  The applicants are opposed by the father of the deceased policeman, Mr Simon Mkhananda Manana on the basis that the offence was not committed with a political objective but was purely a criminal act.  Both Applicants and Mr Simon Manana testified at the hearing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In broad outline the testimony of the two Applicants corresponded in that both testified that there was a boycott of white owned businesses in the township organised by SACO (Sivukile Action Committee Organisation), an organisation affiliated to the ANC of which both of them were members;  that policemen were driven out of the township but that the deceased was allowed to stay since he had undertaken to support them and regarded himself as one of them;  that the deceased thereafter became uncooperative in that he refused to be searched at a roadblock set up by SACO and at the entrance of the night club where they all were at the night of the incident during which the deceased was killed and that he had bought items from a white business.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The father of the deceased conceded that there was a consumer boycott of white owned businesses at the time.  Both Applicants were well known to him and, in fact, as members of his soccer club regarded him as a father.  He saw them as a gangster mob who were coercing and harassing members of the community inter alia a counsellor one Johannes Zwane who did not want his sons to become members of SACO.  He further said in cross-examination that he, himself, had not been opposed to the consumer boycott but indicated that in a small community like Morgenzon the boycott caused hardship and that not to have bought from businesses in town would have caused members of the community to have suffered starvation and the Applicants themselves bought in town.  He could not in his evidence shed any light on the circumstances of the incident at the tavern.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>After consideration of all the above the Committee concludes that the Applicants have met all the requirements of Section 20 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, No. 34 of 1995 (&quot;the Act&quot;), that the acts were committed with a political objective and that the Applicants have made a full disclosure of all relevant facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Accordingly amnesty is GRANTED to Joseph Makhanye and Jabulane Makhanye for the murder of Ernest Mfanayedwa Manana in or near Sivukile, Morgenzon on the 4th May 1990.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In our opinion the next-of-kin of the deceased are victims in relation to the incident and the matter is referred to the Reparation and Rehabilitation Committee for consideration in terms of the provisions of Section 22(1) of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DATED this ................... day of..........................  1999.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_______________________ JUDGE DENZIL POTGIETER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_______________________ADV. CHRIS DE JAGER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_______________________ADV. FRANCIS BOSMAN</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>