<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>KABELO NIMROD MATLALETSA AND 15 OTHERS</names>
		<matter>AM 5096/97 (see original document for more)</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59131&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2000/ac200149.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="94">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The above sixteen applicants unless otherwise indicated, relate to offences and delicts committed in ANC camps in Angola or Zambia.  Before dealing with the evidence relating to the specific offences, the Committee deemed it necessary to deal with the background leading to the establishment of these camps.  This had been dealt with by various commissions during the past two decades, including the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.  The Committee will briefly refer to the conclusions drawn by these commissions and to aspects of the evidence given before them that might be relevant.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The TRC concluded as follows in Volume 2 Page 366 of its report:-</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Commission finds that &quot;suspected agents&quot; were routinely subjected to torture and other forms of severe ill-treatment and that there were cases where such individuals were charged and convicted by tribunals without proper attention to due process being afforded them, sentenced to death and executed.  The Commission finds that these were acts in which the individuals so affected had their human rights grossly violated.  Likewise, the Commission finds that the failure to communicate properly with the families of such victims constituted callous and insensitive conduct.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Commission also finds that all mutineers who were executed after conviction by military tribunal, irrespective of whether they were afforded proper legal representation and adequate due process, suffered gross violation of their human rights.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>With regard to allegations of torture, the Commission finds that, although it was not ANC Policy to use torture, the security department of the ANC routinely used torture to extract information and confessions from those being held in camps, particularly in the period 1979-89.  The Commission has taken note of the various forms of torture detailed in the Motsuenyane Commission and finds that they amounted to the deliberate infliction of pain and/or severe ill-treatment in the form of detention in solitary confinement and/or the deliberate withholding of food and water and/or medical care and, as such, amounted to the perpetration of gross violations of human rights.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Commission finds further that adequate steps were not taken in good time against those responsible for such violations.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>General Masondo further testified that it was against the policy of the ANC to torture people to obtain confessions.  Yet, he conceded that it did happen and that in some instances people were starved and ultimately even executed without bringing them before a tribunal.  This was according to his evidence never approved of by the ANC but they recognised that a method of third degree was used in order to obtain confessions.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is against this background that the Committee has to deal with the present applications.  Serious consideration had to be given to the fact that the applicants acted against the policy of their own political movement and in many cases acted against their own loyal party members who committed crimes like smoking dagga or simply ignored party rules.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>As far as military forces are concerned it was always accepted that they had to maintain strict discipline in order to operate successfully.  The Committee accepts that if the objective was to discipline members of an organisation in order to build an effective military organisation to fight the political struggle, offences associated with that objective would fall within the definition of acts, omissions or offences associated with a political objective.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee will now, against this background, deal with the different applications.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The following applications were not proceeded with and were formally withdrawn by the applicants:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>1. Kabelo Nimrod Matlaletsa - AM 5096/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>2. W.N. Dlamini - AM 5288/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>3. Keith Matila Mokoape - AM 5513/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>4. Oupa Shadrack Khumalo - AM 6302/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>5. Itumeleng Tsimane - AM 6305/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>6. Lulamile Lennox Magajana - AM 7399/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>7. Ralph Peterson - AM 7508/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>8. Harold Tebogo Khoabane - AM 8065/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>9. Bazil Mkulu Mavuso - AM 6319/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee heard evidence in the applications that are dealt with below:-</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>10. DECISION IN THE APPLICATION OF SAUL</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>This applicant testified that he was a member of the ANC and that he took part in the interrogation of Sizwe Mabaso as a recording officer.  The latter was suspected of collaborating with the security police and supplying information to them which lead to the arrest and detention of Thandi Modise.  Mabaso was brought to the safe house in Maputo which served as head quarters of the ANC.  The applicant was ordered by his superior, Dan Mohapi, alias Stalin, to assist with the interrogation of Mabaso.  They tied him up during the interrogation and continuously hit him so that he would confess to his role in the arrest of Thandi Modise.  He was recruited by Thandi Modise to her Unit and was suspected of causing her arrest.  During interrogation he contradicted himself and that caused the assault on him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee concluded as follows:-</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to the applicant in respect of the assault on Sizwe Mabaso during interrogation at the head quarters of the ANC in Maputo during 1982.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In terms of Section 22 of Act 34 of 1995 Sizwe Mabaso is considered to be a victim and is referred to the Committee on Reparation and Rehabilitation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>11. DECISION:  APPLICATION OF THABO JOHN SPHAMBO</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>AM 5097/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant applies for amnesty in respect of any offence which led to the death or contributed to the death of Eric Pharatsi in the Kibashi Camp (Camp 13) in Angola.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant testified that he was the Recording Officer and Acting Chief of Staff in the Camp.  The command structure of the camp comprised of Livingstone Gaza, the commander, the applicant, Edwin Mabitse, a commissioner and one Victor who was the chief logistic officer.  They received information that Eric Pharatsi was stealing camp property and was exchanging it for dagga which he brought back and distributed in the camp.  The smoking of dagga was prohibited in the camp.  They considered the matter and found Eric Pharatsi guilty and ordered that he should be kept in solitary confinement.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant further testified that he received a report on the following day that Pharatsi died in the underground cell of suffocation because, unknown to him, he suffered from asthma.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>She further complained that she was not shown his grave notwithstanding promises by General Masondo and Commander Ngwane that she would be taken to his grave.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is satisfied that he made a full disclosure of his involvement in the punishment of the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the result amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to the applicant in respect of any offence or delict flowing from the detention of Eric Pharatsi in an underground cell in Camp 13, Kibashe, Angola and his death during such detention.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The mother of the deceased Mrs. I.N. Pharatsi (011-936 8057) is referred to the Committee on Reparation and Rehabilitation in terms of Section 22 of Act 34 of 1995.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISIONS IN THE APPLICATIONS OF MZWANDILE LEON NDABA AM 5100/97 AND CHARLES MARTIN MOTLALENTOU LIETA  AM 5295/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Apart from the application forms completed by the applicants, the Committee was also furnished with extracts from the Motsuenyane report dealing with the assault on Bhekinhlanhla Goodluck Mpungose.  Mr Mpungose also attended the hearing and testified before the Committee and he also confirmed the contents of an affidavit previously filed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Both applicants were members of the counter intelligence unit of the ANC, stationed at (Hammersdale), Lusaka.  Their Unit consisted of Tim Williams who was in command, a person known as Bonny M. and the two applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Williams instructed them to arrest the applicant after he had been lured to Zimbabwe and thereafter to Zambia by one Bafana Duma.  After arresting him they took him to a house in Hammersdale where they searched him and started debriefing him.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It was further common cause that Mpungose was a former policeman who retired from the police force in 1979 and thereafter became a herbalist.  His previous commander was a certain Captain Botha and according to the applicants they received information that Mpungose gave information to Botha which led to the arrest of four ANC cadres.  Mpungose denied that he gave any information to Botha and that any member of the ANC who was known to him at the time, was in fact arrested.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicants further testified that they took part in the interrogation and debriefing of Mpungose.  They said he confessed that he was an agent of the enemy but would then again retract his confession.  As a result thereof they assaulted him, inter alia by beating the soles of his feet.  They on one occasion took him to the Congela Farm where they interrogated and assaulted him from about 7.00 in the evening till 4.00 in the morning.  He then confessed that he was an enemy agent and Williams reported that to the leadership.  The leadership then decided that he should be transferred to Angola for further detention.  He was taken to Angola by applicant Ndaba who was also known as Spinks and according to him he was again assaulted and humiliated by Ndaba in Angola.  He ultimately landed in Camp 32, also known as Quadro, where he was detained for 3 years and 7 months without being given the opportunity to appear before a tribunal.  As previously stated this incident was investigated by the Motsuenyane Commission who found that Ndaba who was also known as Floyd Huna or Spinks used excessive force on Mpongose in Lusaka as well as in Luanda.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Mpungose testified about the various assaults, stating that apart from being beaten up, he was hung upside down from a tree, burnt with a candle underneath his feet and showed various marks indicative of assaults on his body.  He further stated that although the applicants did not make a full disclosure about the manner in which they assaulted him, he does not wish to oppose their applications for amnesty.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the result amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to both applicants in respect of the following offences</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>A</text>
		</line>
		<line number="61" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>1. The kidnapping of Bhekinhlanhla Goodluck Mpungose on or about 20 May 1987 at Lusaka.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="62">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>2. The assaults with intention to do grievous bodily harm on the said Mpungose at Lusaka and on Congela Farm on various occasions during the period 20 May 1987 to 15 July 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="63">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>B. Amnesty is also </text>
		</line>
		<line number="64">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to Ndaba in respect of assaults on the said Mpungose at Luanda during the latter half of 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="65">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is recommended that Bhekinhlanhla Goodluck Mpungose should be considered to be a victim in terms of Section 22 of Act 34 of 1995.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="66">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>14.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="67">
			<speaker>DECISION IN THE APPLICATION OF SAMUEL </speaker>
			<text>WATHEDI MANGENA   AM 5275/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="68">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>During 1984 some of the ANC cadres had been accused of mutiny against the ANC command.  They were arrested and imprisoned in Luanda.  They went on a hunger-strike and the Angolans requested the ANC to remove them from the Angolan prison.  It was decided to take them to Camp 32 (also known as Quadro) Edward Dlamini was one of the leaders of the mutineers.  During the transportation a scuffle broke out between him and the ANC soldiers overseeing the prisoners.  The applicant, who was one of the MK soldiers responsible for transporting the prisoners, forcefully subdued Dlamini.  The applicant seeks amnesty for this assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="69">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is satisfied that the applicant met the requirements of Act 34 of 1995 and amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="70">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to the applicant in respect of the assault on Edward Dlamini during 1984 on the road from Luanda to Camp 32.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="71">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>15. DECISION IN THE APPLICATION OF MZWANDILE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="72">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ALPHEUS DAMOYI  AM 6303/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="73">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant was the camp commander at camp 32 in Angola.  He seeks amnesty because he feels responsible for the death of two inmates, Zaba Maledza and Edward Masuku, who died during detention.  It was suspected that Maledza committed suicide because the electric bulb in his cell was missing and that Masuku died because of a lack of blood.  His palms and feet were very pale.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="74">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant testified that he felt responsible for their deaths because he, as camp commander, failed to built bigger and better cells for the detention of inmates.  In his application he stated, &quot;some of the inmates whose names I have forgotten died because of congestion, some because of the dampness of the floor where they were kept.&quot;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="75">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>On the evidence it is not clear whether the applicant is indeed guilty of committing an offence.  He, however, accepted responsibility for the deaths of the inmates who died while in detention under his command.  It may be that his negligence contributed to their ill-health and death.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="76">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="77">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to the applicant in respect of any offence or delict committed by him while he was the camp commander of Camp 32 and which contributed to the deaths of Zaba Maledza and Edward Masuku during 1983 to 1985.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="78">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>16.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="79">
			<speaker>DECISION IN THE APPLICATION OF MORUTI EDMUND </speaker>
			<text>NOOSI AM 6304/97</text>
		</line>
		<line number="80">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant was a member of the ANC, serving in the Security Unit as a Recording Officer.  He seeks amnesty for firing a shot at Khotso Morena also known as Mwenzi Twala, in an attempt to kill him and for the assault on Ben Masero.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="81">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He testified that there was mutiny in several ANC camps during 1984.  He was one of the ANC soldiers who were sent to disarm the mutineers.  While they were in the process of disarming and arresting them Twala started to run towards the tent of the leadership where arms were kept.  He ignored shouts to halt and the applicant fired a shot at him and wounded him.  His objective was to protect the ANC leadership who in the tent namely Chris Hani, Joe Modise and Lambert Moloi.  The offence was associated with the political objective of protecting the ANC leadership.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="82">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>He also applies for amnesty in respect of an assault on Ben Maseko (real name Don Sipho Mashela).  According to him he had to discipline Maseko who was detained because they considered him to be a security risk.  The applicant also conceded in cross examination by the legal representative of Maseko that he interrogated him but denied that he ever hit him with a pistol butt.  The victim, Maseko, showed a scar on his nose, complained about an injury causing bad eye sight and indicated various scars on his body, testifying that they were the result of assaults.  He further testified that his real name is Don Sipho Mashela and that he was assaulted by the applicant on various occasions.  The applicant only applied for one incident of assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="83">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>We have dealt with the background to the camp detentions and the fact that assaults were contrary to ANC policy, rules and regulations.  It was however a fact that assaults did occur and that a blind eye was turned on force being used to obtain confessions.  The applicant only applied for one incident of assault.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="84">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>After considering the evidence the Committee is satisfied that the application fall within the ambit of Act 34 of 1995.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="85">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Amnesty is </text>
		</line>
		<line number="86">
			<speaker>GRANTED</speaker>
			<text>to the applicant in respect of an assault on Don Sipho Mashela alias Ben Maseko in Camp 32 in Angola during or about September 1981, at or near the medical depot.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="87">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is recommended that Don Sipho Mashela be declared to be a victim in terms of Act 34 of 1995.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="88">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>SIGNED AT CAPE TOWN ON THIS THE _______ DAY OF ____________ 2000.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="89">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>___________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="90">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE A. WILSON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="91">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>___________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="92">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>C. DE JAGER (AJ)</text>
		</line>
		<line number="93">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>___________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="94">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR J B SIBANYONI</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>