<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>MORRIS LESHOKA KGOETE, JEFFREY LUCKY MASUKU, JACOB LESIBA MANASOE, JOHANNES NTEBELE NTSHABELENG</names>
		<matter>AM 145/96; AM 0169/96; AM 1299/96; AM 7280/97</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59183&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2000/ac200202.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="16">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>These are applications for amnesty in terms of the provisions of Section 18 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act, No 34 of 1995 (&quot;the Act&quot;).  The matter relates to the killing of Philemon Mesehla (&quot;the deceased&quot;) at or near Mooihoek, Nebo in the former Lebowa on or about 15 August 1990.  Pursuant to the incident, all of the Applicants were convicted of murder and sentenced to direct imprisonment.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>All the applicants testified in support of the application.  The widow of the deceased, Mrs Helen Manapo Masehla, was legally represented at the hearing but elected to submit an affidavit, exhibit &quot;A&quot;, setting out he position instead of testifying tin view of her emotional state following the tragic death of her husband.  She basically left the decision of the matter in the hands of the Committee.  Her legal representative, Adv. Vilakazi, presented the evidence of Moses Masehla, the uncle of the deceased.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The version of Applicants is that at all material times they were all members of the African National Congress (&quot;ANC&quot;) and the self defence unit (&quot;SDU&quot;) in Mooihek which is a rural village subject to tribal structures.  A senior ANC member and community leader at Mooihek, Mr Makena, was killed on 10 August 1990 while driving his taxi between Tafelkop and Mooihek.  The ANC and SDU suspected that this incident was linked to incidents of violence affecting taxis in the area in which a number of ANC members were targeted and killed.  These incidents were regarded as politically motivated attacks on the ANC and its members by anti-ANC elements within the taxi industry.  The ANC and SDU leadership decided that this calls for retaliation in defence of the organisation and its membership and to send a message to its opponents that ANC interests would be protected at all costs.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>A further meeting was held at a school in Mooihoek on 15 August 1990 for the purpose of a report back on the search for the suspects.  Joseph Phiri reported to the meeting that the suspects had indicated that the deceased hired them to kill Mr Makena.  After some discussion a decision was taken that a delegation would approach a sangoma to get a further view on the matter.  This delegation would approach a sangoma to get a further view on the matter.  This delegation included Joseph Phiri and Jeffrey Masuku, the second Applicant, who had actually made the suggestion that the meeting consult a sangoma.  After an unsuccessful attempt to consult the sangoma who was initially proposed, the delegation managed to see another sangoma.  Upon their return to the meeting at the school, Joseph Phiri reported back that the sangoma also identified the deceased as the person responsible for the killing of Mr Makena.  A group was sent to collect the deceased as well as his uncle, Moses Masehla, and deliver them to the meeting.  The deceased was lured from his home, apprehended and brought to the meeting.  A different group secured the attendance of Moses Masehla at the meeting.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The deceased was questioned about the killing of Mr Makena.  He confessed his role in the killing.  He repeated the confession to Moses Masehla, after the latter wanted to make sure that the deceased was indeed involved.  The meeting then decided that the deceased should be executed.  Some petrol and a tyre were collected and the deceased taken into the mountain where he was executed by means of the necklace.  After this body was set alight, the crowd fled from the scene.  All of the applicants were present throughout the proceedings and played a greater or lesser role therein.  They all associated themselves with the killing of the deceased who was regarded as an enemy of the ANC.  They regarded it as their duty as SDU members to act against a political enemy such as the deceased. The ANC would benefit from the killing because it would send a message to their political enemies intending to kill or attack their members, that such actions will not be tolerated.  This would protect their members and defend the position of the ANC within the community against those bent upon weakening its influence. </text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Having carefully considered the matter, we are satisfied that the killing of the deceased constitutes an act associated with a political objective and that applicants have made a full disclosure of all relevant facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the result the applications comply with all the requirements of the Act and amnesty is hereby GRANTED to the applicants in respect of the killing of Philemon Masehla on or about 15 August 1990 at or near Mooihek, Nebo, Lebowa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In our opinion Helen Manapo Masehla is a victim in respect of the killing and is referred for consideration in terms of section 22 of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DATED  at  CAPE TOWN  this   14  day  of  November  2000</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_____________________________ JUDGE DENZIL POTGIETER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_____________________________ ADV N SANDI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>_____________________________ ADV F BOSMAN</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>