<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>JACOBUS JOHANNES DE RU</names>
		<matter>AM 1780/96</matter>
				<decision>REFUSED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59186&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2000/ac200205.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="18">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Applicant applies for amnesty for the killing of three (3) persons, Makhulu Solomon Khumalo, Richard Suputane Makhubo and Phiphaphang Joseph Kabokoane, at Vaalpark in the district of Sasolburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The necessary preparations for the arrest were made.  When the deceased arrived at the centre where they were to be carefully arrested, things went wrong, a shot rang out and all three were killed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It suffices to say that on the version of the applicant himself, he a planned a lawful arrest when, through some negligence, he ordered his men to shoot after having interpreted gunfire as coming from the vehicle of the deceased.  He claims to have ordered the shooting to protect his own life and that of his men.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee does not have to make a finding though, because if on the other hand the version of the applicant is to be believed, it does not establish a political objective for the killing.  In such an event the killings were done in the course of an attempted lawful arrest and the questions of self-defence and necessity can be decided by a court of law.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the instance the application for amnesty is REFUSED.  No person is accordingly found to be a victim in terms of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DATED  AT   CAPE  TOWN this     16   day of   November   2000</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE A WILSON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ADV S SIGODI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR W MALAN</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>