<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>EUGENE ALEXANDER DE KOCK,DAVID JACOBUS BRITS,JOHANNES JACOBUS SWART,WILLEM ALBERTUS NORTJE,LAWRENCE JOHN HANTON,ANDREW RUSSELL CAVILL TAYLOR,JOHANNES ALBERTUS STEYN</names>
		<matter>AM 0066/96,AM 3745/96,AM 3750/96,AM 3764/96,AM 4076/96,AM 4077/96,AM 4573/96</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED/REFUSED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59213&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2000/ac20090.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="41">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>______________________________________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>This is an application for amnesty in terms of Section 18 of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995 (&quot;the Act&quot;).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Applicants, who are for convenience sake referred to by their surnames, apply for amnesty in respect of the following incident:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The conspiracy, planning, abduction, assault and killing of Goodwill Colin &quot;Neville&quot; Sikhakhane (&quot;Sikhakhane&quot;) on 29 January 1991 at or near Greytown in the then Natal.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>All the Applicants except for Taylor who is deceased testified.  The gist of their evidence is to the effect that Sikhakhane had become an &quot;askari&quot; during 1988 after defecting from the ANC who were apparently intent on sending him to Angola due to, inter alia, disciplinary problems.  Some of the Applicants and their colleagues assisted Sikhakhane, his common law wife and their child to enter the Republic unlawfully.  Sikhakhane and his family were moved to the Pietermaritzburg area.  </text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>At the time material to these applications he was working with the &quot;Terrorist Location Unit&quot; which was a sub-branch of the Security Branch of the South African Police, Division Natal, based at Camperdown and under Taylor&#039;s command.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Engelbrecht denies any knowledge of the matter and Steyn insists that he didn&#039;t &quot;clear the matter up&quot; with Engelbrecht.  However, in the light of the euphemisms used and the prevailing &quot;need to know&quot; culture we have no reason to doubt De Kock&#039;s bona fides in the matter.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>De Kock testified that he handed Nortje between five and seven thousand rand in cash for necessary expenses and a silenced AK-47 for use in the operation.  He then gave instructions for Nortje to liaise with Taylor and Hanton with regard to the further conduct of the operation.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Nortje, Brits and Swart met Taylor and Hanton at Mooi River as arranged and proceeded to a bar at Mpushini where they discussed what needed doing and thereafter they checked into the Lion Park Inn where further planning was done with Hanton after Taylor had left.  The following day Nortje hired a minibus.  Hanton made an arrangement to meet Sikhakhane later that night and the AK-47 was tested.  A site for the killing was reconnoitred.  False registration plates were fitted to the vehicle.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The four of them then left for Greytown.  They stopped off at a bar in new Hanover where they waited until the time they had arranged to meet Sikhakhane arrived.  They then proceeded to Greytown and met Sikhakhane.  After they picked up Sikhakhane they drove off.  Nortje and Brits who had been hiding in the back of the vehicle then overpowered Sikhakhane and handcuffed him.  In the process Nortje assaulted him by hitting him on the head a number of times with some sort of leather &quot;baton&quot; containing a metal ball.  Brits was also hit on the hand in the process and blood was found in the vehicle the following day.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>They drove to the place identified earlier that day.  It was an isolated spot on the Kranskop Road approximately five kilometres outside Greytown where the road passed through plantations.  Sikhakhane was taken out of the vehicle, carried up a bank by Nortje and Brits.  Hanton followed them while Swart drove off in the vehicle to avoid attracting attention.  Brits held Sikhakhane down by placing his foot on Sikhakhane&#039;s throat.  Nortje shot Sikhakhane two or three times with the AK-47.  Swart returned soon after this and they departed for Pietermaritzburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The next day they cleaned the vehicle and returned to it.  Hanton went to report to Taylor and Nortje, Brits and Swart travelled back to Vlakplaas and reported to de Kock.  He says that he reported to Engelbrecht.  De Kock says he gave Nortje the balance of the cash left over from the operation in the sum of approximately R2000.00.  This was confirmed by Nortje.  However, it is apparent to us that Nortje had no expectation with regard to this payment and that it formed no part of his motivation with regard to the acts committed.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>There was no clarity before us about how Sikhakhane&#039;s body was found, identified or whether an investigation or inquest was held.  We have seen a copy of the post-mortem examination which was conducted after his body was exhumed and are satisfied that the finding accords with the evidence tendered by the Applicants.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Although there were numerous small inconsistencies and improbabilities in the evidence of some of the Applicants that we do not intend to canvass for the purposes of this decision, we are satisfied that they have made a full disclosure of all relevant facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>It is clear to us that most of the Applicants believed that Sikhakhane posed a serious security risk to them and their colleagues and that the information at his disposal could have seriously embarrassed the then Government and weakened its negotiating position.  Alternatively, some of the Applicants acted upon the orders of senior officers whose judgement they trusted and in any event would not have questioned.  We are thus satisfied that the Applicants have complied with the requirements of Section 20(1) of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the result amnesty is GRANTED in respect of all acts, omissions or offences, including delicts, arising from or in connection with:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>1. The conspiracy, planning and killing of Goodwill Colin &quot;Neville&quot; Sikhakhane (&quot;Sikhakhane&quot;) on 29 January 1991 at or near Greytown in the then Natal (&quot;the killing&quot;);</text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>2. The relevant contraventions of Act 75 of 1969 arising from the unlawful possession of an AK-47 automatic rifle, a Makarov pistol and the ammunition for both firearms in connection with the killing;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>3. The abduction of Sikhakhane prior to the killing;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>4. The assault on Sikhakhane prior to the killing;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>5. Defeating the ends of justice in connection with the killing;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>6. Assisting Sikhakhane and his family to enter the Republic of South Africa unlawfully during April 1988;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>in the following respects to the following Applicants:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="26" isquote="true">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>a) Eugene Alexander de Kock: with regard to 1, 2 and 5 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (b) David Jacobus Brits: with regard to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (c) Johannes Jacobus Swart: with regard to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (d) Willem Albertus Nortje: with regard to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (e) Lawrence John Hanton: with regard to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (f) Andrew Russel Cavill Taylor: with regard to 1 and 5 above;</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text> (g) Johannes Albertus Steyn: with regard to 1 and 5 above.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Amnesty is REFUSED with regard to the fraud and theft of State monies in connection with the killing.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Amnesty Committee is of the opinion that the relatives and dependants of the deceased Goodwill Colin &quot;Neville&quot; Sikhakhane are victims as defined in the Act and are accordingly referred to the Committee on reparation and Rehabilitation for consideration as such, in terms of Section 26 of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DATED at        this          day of                2000</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>___________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE A WILSON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>____________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR J B SIBANYONI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>____________________________</text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR I LAX</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>