<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>FRANK McCARTER,ADRIAN STEPHEN ROSSLEE,IZAK DANIEL BOSCH,ANDY TAYLOR,LAWRENCE GERALD WASSERMAN,JOHANNES ALBERTUS STEYN,ROELOF BRAND VISAGIE,JACOBUS ADRIAAN VORSTER</names>
		<matter>AM4063/96,AM4378/96,AM3765/96,AM4077/96,AM4508/96,AM4513/96,AM5169/97,AM4390/96</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59394&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2001/ac21112.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="60">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 1: The first 5 Applicants apply for amnesty for   the abduction, assault and killing of Sipho Stanley Bhila near Durban on 22   February 1987.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 2: The 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 10th and 11th Applicants   apply for amnesty for the abduction from Swaziland and killing at Elandskop   of Phila Portia Ndwandwe, also known as MK Zandile, towards the end of October   1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 3: The 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th Applicants   apply for amnesty for the abduction, assault and killing of Phumezo Nxiweni   at Durban on 4 and 5 November 1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 4: The 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th Applicants apply   for amnesty for the abduction, assault and killing of Sibusiso Ndlovu, Amanzi   Vilakazi and Elias Gift Matjale and the disposal of their bodies by explosives   at Durban on 18 November 1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The evidence, which is common   cause among the Applicants, can be briefly summarised as follows:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 1</text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is satisfied that   the incident occurred within the context of the conflicts of the past, that   the acts of the Applicants were associated with a political objective and that   they have made a full disclosure of all material and relevant facts.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 2</text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee has therefore to   decide whether the failure to disclose the names of the informers places the   Applicants in breach of their obligation to make &quot;a full disclosure of   all relevant facts&quot; as envisaged by Section 20(1)(c) of the Act on the   Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation, Act 34 of 1995 (the Act).</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is further of the   opinion that Phila Portia Ndwandwe is a victim as envisaged in the Act and her   name and the particulars of her next-of-kin is being forwarded to the Reparations   and Rehabilitation Committee for its consideration.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 3</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The incident was later reported   to the 6th Applicant who explicitly approved of their actions after the event.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 4</text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is further of the   opinion that Sibusiso Ndlovu, Amanzi Vilakazi and Elias Gift Matjale are all   victims as envisaged in the Act and their names and particulars of their next-of-kin   are being forwarded to the Reparations and Rehabilitation Committee for its   consideration.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE A WILSON</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ADV. S SIGODI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR W MALAN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>??</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>2</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="60">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>24</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>