<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>PAUL ERASMUS</names>
		<matter>AM3690/96</matter>
				<decision>GRANTED/REFUSED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59512&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2001/ac21230.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="59">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The applicant has applied for   amnesty in respect of approximately 86 incidents.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>This decision only relates to   the incidents in respect of which a public hearing was held and viva voce evidence   was given before this Committee, namely:-</text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Incident 2: Attempted and malicious damage to the property   of</text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Incident 8: The attack of Goodman Mogami</text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>As the applicant has previously   given evidence regarding his political background and occupation at the material   times, we shall not deal with that aspect of his evidence but confine our decision   to the relevant incidents in respect of which evidence was given.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Having considered all the evidence   tendered herein, we are satisfied that the applicant&#039;s participation in the   alleged attack was not an act associated with a political objective as defined   in the Act in that on his own version the attack was not as a result of a considered   decision but was as a result of a &quot;spur of the moment decision&quot; after   he and his colleagues were in a &quot;drunken brawl&quot;.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>As a result of the aforegoing,   amnesty is REFUSED in respect of the following offences:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>INCIDENT 2: The Helen Joseph Incident.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is satisfied that   his application insofar as it relates to the above incident complies with the   requirements of the Act and amnesty is GRANTED in respect of:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is satisfied that   the requirements of the Act for the granting of amnesty have been met.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Amnesty is accordingly GRANTED   to the applicant in respect of any offence or delict related to the entry of   the premises where Mr Berrange stayed and the tampering with this clothing during   1981 at Berea, Johannesburg.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="37">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="38">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="39">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="40">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="41">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="42">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="43">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>Having considered the evidence   before it, the Committee is satisfied that the requirements of the Act have   been met and amnesty is GRANTED to the applicant in respect of the assault committed   on Mr Deepak Madhav at his residence during 1988.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="44">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="45">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="46">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="47">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="48">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="49">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee is of the opinion   that Mrs Helen Joseph, Ms Ann Hughes, Mr Deepak Madhav, Mr Vernon Berrange and   Mr Goodman Mogale are victims, as defined by the Act and are hereby referred   to the Reparations and Rehabilitation Committee for consideration in terms of   Section 22 of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="50">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="51">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>JUDGE S KHAMPEPE</text>
		</line>
		<line number="52">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ACTING JUDGE   C DE JAGER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="53">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ADV S SIGODI</text>
		</line>
		<line number="54">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>??</text>
		</line>
		<line number="55">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="56">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>2</text>
		</line>
		<line number="57">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>__</text>
		</line>
		<line number="58">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="59">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>13</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>