<?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1252"?>
<hearing xmlns="http://trc.saha.org.za/hearing/xml" schemaLocation="https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/export/hearingxml.xsd">
	<systype>decisions</systype>
	<type>AMNESTY DECISIONS</type>
				<names>MAPHUTHI JOSEPH CHIDI</names>
		<matter>AM0708/96</matter>
				<decision>REFUSED</decision>
	<url>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/hearing.php?id=59549&amp;t=&amp;tab=hearings</url>
	<originalhtml>https://sabctrc.saha.org.za/originals/decisions/2001/ac21270.htm</originalhtml>
		<lines count="36">
		<line number="1">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>DECISION</text>
		</line>
		<line number="2">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Applicant is applying for   amnesty in respect of the murder of Gideon Moeng on 7 May 1986 at Tembisa.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="3">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="4">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="5">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="6">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="7">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="8">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="9">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="10">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="11">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="12">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="13">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="14">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="15">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>See Johannesburg Local Road Transportation   Board and Others vs David Mortan Transport (Pty) Ltd. 1976 (1) SA 887 at 903   H.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="16">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="17">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>See also Die Afrikaanse Pers Bpk   vs Neser 1948 (2) SA 295 C at 297.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="18">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="19">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="20">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="21">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="22">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="23">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>In the result amnesty is REFUSED   in respect of:</text>
		</line>
		<line number="24">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="25">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="26">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>The Committee, as envisaged in   Section 22(2) of Act 34 of 1995, is of opinion that Mrs Moeng, the widow of   the deceased and their three children are victims in relation to the above offence   and refers the matter to the Committee on Reparation and Rehabilitation for   its consideration in terms of Section 26 of the Act.</text>
		</line>
		<line number="27">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text></text>
		</line>
		<line number="28">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ACTING JUDGE N J MOTATA</text>
		</line>
		<line number="29">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>ACTING JUDGE C DE JAGER</text>
		</line>
		<line number="30">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>MR W C MALAN</text>
		</line>
		<line number="31">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>??</text>
		</line>
		<line number="32">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="33">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>7</text>
		</line>
		<line number="34">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>/...</text>
		</line>
		<line number="35">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>8</text>
		</line>
		<line number="36">
			<speaker></speaker>
			<text>8</text>
		</line>
	</lines>
</hearing>