News | Sport | TV | Radio | Education | TV Licenses | Contact Us |
Amnesty HearingsType AMNESTY HEARINGS Starting Date 03 May 1999 Location JOHANNESBURG Day 1 Names A. GROBBELAAR Case Number AM 4143/96 Back To Top Click on the links below to view results for: +grobbelaar +ac Line 1Line 2Line 5Line 6Line 7Line 9Line 11Line 13Line 15Line 18Line 20Line 22Line 24Line 27Line 29Line 31Line 33Line 36Line 38Line 40Line 42Line 48Line 50Line 52Line 54Line 56Line 63Line 66Line 68Line 70Line 72Line 74Line 76Line 78Line 82Line 88Line 90Line 92Line 94Line 96Line 98Line 106Line 108Line 111Line 113Line 115Line 117Line 119Line 121Line 123Line 125Line 127Line 129Line 131Line 133Line 135Line 137Line 140Line 145Line 146Line 148Line 150Line 152Line 154Line 157Line 159Line 161Line 164Line 166Line 168Line 170Line 172Line 174Line 176Line 178Line 180Line 183Line 184Line 186Line 188Line 189Line 190 CHAIRPERSON: Mr Grobbelaar, its not possible for you to rise so you will have to be seated while you take the oath. The witness would like to testify in Afrikaans. ABRAHAM GROBBELAAR: (sworn states) EXAMINATION BY MR VISSER: Thank you Chairperson. I would like to know if that microphone could be moved just a little bit closer to Mr Grobbelaar, thank you. Mr Grobbelaar, Exhibit D is a summary of your evidence. Is that correct? MR GROBBELAAR: That’s correct. MR VISSER: You have studied it and you confirm the correctness thereof. MR VISSER: You are also applying for the death of three Cosas members and the injury of one. MR GROBBELAAR: That’s correct. MR VISSER: You refer to the background document, Exhibit A, and you request that that information also be incorporated with your evidence. MR GROBBELAAR: That’s correct. MR VISSER: Is there any aspect of Exhibit A which you feel is not of application to you? MR VISSER: Your Amnesty Application appears in Bundle 1 page 214 and following up to page 220. Do you confirm the correctness of the content of that document? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes I confirm this. MR VISSER: In paragraph 7(a) where you were asked whether or not you were the supporter of a political party you stated non applicable. Is that answer correct? MR GROBBELAAR: I did indeed belong to a political organisation and that was the National Party. MR VISSER: Thus 7(a) should actually read National Party and (b) should reader supporter. Is that correct? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that’s correct. MR VISSER: If we could then come to this particular event on page 2 paragraph 2, would you submit to the Committee regarding your knowledge and involvement in the incident? In 1982 I was stationed in Soweto. Col J.C. Coetzee who was then a Captain, was the Commander of Vlakplaas. At a stage earlier in 1982 he was busy with investigation and detection of terrorists in the Soweto environment. That was also my work in Soweto and it led to the fact that he and I began to exchange information. MR VISSER: Might I just interrupt you? What was your rank during that year? MR GROBBELAAR: I was also a Captain. MR VISSER: And what were your duties in the security branch? MR GROBBELAAR: My duties were the detection of terrorists and then I was also in command of the investigative unit and the detection unit. MR VISSER: As well as intelligence gathering? MR GROBBELAAR: Partially the gathering of intelligence but that was not the most important component because we could obtain information from other sources as well. MR VISSER: Very well, continue, paragraph 4. MR GROBBELAAR: One day he told me that he had received a report from a new Askari that he had met a certain Musi. Apparently Musi has asked Mfalapitsa to assist him and some of his Cosas friends with the supply of weapons and weapons training because it was their intention to murder W/A Nkosi who was stationed at the security branch in Krugersdorp. My attention was fixed upon the fact that Mfalapitsa has also applied for amnesty and that he has also discussed the intention of the group to kill a teacher and black council member, Matsidisa. That is in Bundle 1 page 231. I do not recall that this was discussed with me but I do not deny that it may have been so. MR VISSER: Just before you continue, Cosas members are discussed here. There in the Soweto environment what were the activities according to your knowledge and experience of Cosas members during the time of the struggle of the past? MR GROBBELAAR: My experience was that they were very active in the regard that they intimidated people. They attacked places with bombs, they injured people and murdered people and they were a prominent aspect of the organisation of the ANC which operated on an underground basis. MR VISSER: Did they contribute to the intensification of the revolutionary climate? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that’s correct. MR VISSER: Would you continue, paragraph 6 regarding that which was told to you by Col Coetzee? MR GROBBELAAR: My attention was fixed on the fact that Mfalapitsa MR VISSER: No you have already completed that. Continue with paragraph 6. MR GROBBELAAR: Seeing as the matter emanated from a new Askari member who had to be protected at all costs, Col Coetzee decided to discuss the matter with Brig Schoon at Head office. Later I was informed by Coetzee that Brig Schoon had recommended that Mfalapitsa should receive an order to dissuade the four Cosas members from their plans. A few days later Col Jan Coetzee informed me that things had changed. He informed me that Mfalapitsa had reported that the Cosas members were not prepared to leave their plans and that they were so serious that they had already compiled a sketch plan upon which certain houses were marked for assault and that they were anxious to do something for the struggle. It appeared that there was nothing else to be done about the situation and that Nkosi’s life was in danger. Col Coetzee went to speak to Brig Schoon once again and later he informed me that the Cosas members were to be eliminated and that he required my assistance. I reconciled myself with the decision to eliminate the persons. The security branch’s success depended on intelligence. Askaris played a valuable role in the identification of ANC supporters. Without informers and the Askaris the Security Branch would not have been capable of combating the revolutionary struggle. The identity of such persons had to be protected at all costs. Court directed action would, according to my opinion and the facts at my disposal, undoubtedly have led to the exposure of Mfalapitsa as an Askari. It would have endangered his life and it would have diminished his value for the security branch to a great measure. Apart from that, it was clear that the life of W/O Nkosi and his family was in grave danger. MR VISSER: You heard what Brig Schoon said regarding this about the broader picture and the possibility that Nkosi would be killed. Did you listen to that? MR VISSER: Would you agree with that? MR VISSER: And it is also so that in the struggle of the past black council members, who were regarded as sellouts by the ANC SACP Alliance, were also regarded as legitimate targets and were murdered. MR VISSER: And that was in the promotion of the struggle against the former government? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes that’s correct. MR GROBBELAAR: The plan was that weapons and/or explosive devices would be given to them and that an explosion would be arranged which would indicate that they had blown themselves up. I understood that the approval for the action came from Head office, from Brig. Schoon and higher. For the execution of the plan a building on a mining premises near Krugersdorp was selected. That’s a typing error, the bit where it says "where there were buildings". As soon as the four Cosas members were in the building with Mfalapitsa, Mfalapitsa would give a reason to excuse himself. As soon as he had exited the pump house explosives, which had been planted there before the time, would be detonated and the four Cosas members would be killed. I have studied the applicable part of Col J C Coetzee’s Amnesty Application with regard to the operation and I agree with it especially with regard to the role fulfilled by myself. MR VISSER: I beg your pardon, if I might once again interrupt you, there was a member of your unit on the scene, he has since passed away, a Mr van Tonder. MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that’s correct. Yes, we know that three persons were killed and one was injured and considerable damage was brought to the building. Is that correct? MR GROBBELAAR: That’s correct. MR VISSER: You are also aware that in your presence Col Coetzee telephonically reported to Brig Schoon about the matter. MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that’s correct. MR VISSER: This is a bit of a repetition as a result of my error but in paragraph 19 the third sentence, could you read that? MR GROBBELAAR: At all times I was aware of what the objective had been with the relevant operation and I was with Lieut Col Coetzee and Lieut Rorich when the explosion took place which killed the victims and injured the other person. MR VISSER: Yes we are aware of the post mortem inquests. Did you see Mfalapitsa exiting the building at the scene? MR VISSER: Yes, and where did he go? MR GROBBELAAR: He ran towards me and Lieut Rorich where we were hiding. MR VISSER: And when was the explosive device set off? MR GROBBELAAR: Just as he arrived at us Lieut Rorich set the device off. MR GROBBELAAR: I want to emphasis that my action took place during the struggle of the past, that it was aimed against supporters of a liberation movement, in protection and maintenance of the former political dispensation and that I believe bona fide that my action was proportional to my duties as a policeman and in the execution of my duties as authorised. I request, with respect, that my Amnesty Application be granted for my actions and offences in this regard. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR VISSER EXAMINATION BY MS VAN DER WALT: Just one question. You mentioned on page 6 of Exhibit E at paragraph 19 of a Lieut Rorich, I would like to put it to you that during that action he was a Warrant Officer. MR GROBBELAAR: It is possible. I cannot recall what his rank was and that might be quite correct. MS VAN DER WALT: No further questions. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MS VAN DER WALT CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Ms van der Walt. Mr Jansen. MR JANSEN: I have no questions, thank you Chairperson. CROSS-EXAMINATION BY MR TSHABALALA: When they told you about the Cosas four did you suggest any other plan that the killing of the four? MR GROBBELAAR: No, Chairperson. MR TSHABALALA: I take it you agreed with the plan to kill the four? MR TSHABALALA: Before agreeing, did you ask for more information about the four? MR GROBBELAAR: No Chairperson, all that I knew was that Mr Coetzee had at a previous stage told me what would happen and where it happened and to the stage where they did not want to listen any more and that they wanted to go over to action. MR TSHABALALA: And you immediately agreed with the plan? MR GROBBELAAR: That is correct, chairperson. MR TSHABALALA: With regard to Mfalapitsa, the question that Mfalapitsa had requested for amnesty, what persuasive value did it have in you? MR GROBBELAAR: I don’t follow you. Could you please repeat? MR TSHABALALA: The fact that Mfalapitsa had requested amnesty, did you trust him for that? Did you trust Mfalapitsa because he requested for amnesty? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes I trusted him. ADV GCABASHE: Mr Tshabalala, can I just understand the question. You are talking about the fact that he voluntarily agreed to join the security forces, not his current amnesty application? MR TSHABALALA: If I may respond, the applicant had mentioned that Mfalapitsa had requested for amnesty And I gather that with the old laws there were amnesty laws. I stand to be corrected, in fact its indemnity. Mfalapitsa had requested for indemnity. I wanted to know whether that issue ...(intervention) MR VISSER: I’m sorry Chairperson, there’s complete confusion. All that this witness said that he was told that Mfalapitsa applied for amnesty in these hearings, in the amnesty process, that’s all that he said. CHAIRPERSON: Isn’t he perhaps referring, Mr Tshabalala, to when he came into the country he was met by police and then he asked to be left sort of in peace to go on with his life, but they wouldn’t allow it. Isn’t that what you’re referring to? MR TSHABALALA: Okay, Chair, my understanding was, I heard that Mfalapitsa had asked for amnesty. I understood it to be indemnity, so because of this confusion I will withdraw this question and then continue. My apologies, Chair. MR TSHABALALA: Did they inform you about Nkosi? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes Mr Coetzee conveyed this to me. MT TSHABALALA: What did they say about Nkosi? Can you elaborate? MR GROBBELAAR: Mr Coetzee told me that W/O Nkosi was the target whom these four intended to kill. MR TSHABALALA: And so the plan was to protect him? The plan to execute the Cosas was out to protect Nkosi. Did they put it to you like that? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that is so, to protect him. MR TSHABALALA: If I heard you correctly, you said you were also concerned about Mfalapitsa’s life. Is that correct? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes that’s correct. MR TSHABALALA: When you heard that there was this survivor, didn’t you think about the fact that Mfalapitsa would be exposed? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, at a later stage, and I cannot recall exactly when it was, but I heard and this was over the radio, that there was an explosion and three were killed and one was injured and I though about the possibility that Mfalapitsa might be exposed. MR TSHABALALA: Initially you were working towards not exposing Mfalapitsa. What actions did you take then to protect Mfalapitsa after the explosion? MR GROBBELAAR: I did not do anything further to protect Mfalapitsa because he was directly under Mr Coetzee and the reason therefore was that I could not do anything and he only worked in my area at certain times, sometimes a week, sometimes two weeks and then they would move on to the next area. MR TSHABALALA: Yet you were concerned about his life? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes that is so. MR TSHABALALA: What kind of role did you fulfill in the incident on the 15th? MR GROBBELAAR: The actual role which I and my mates played was to go along and to be in radio contact with each, so that we or that I could warn Mr Rorich if innocent people came along or were in the vicinity and the explosion would take place, to prevent them from being injured and that he does not continue with the explosion. That was my purpose there and the purpose of Mr van Tonder. MR TSHABALALA: Did it ever occur to you that when Mfalapitsa went into the room with Cosas 4 that he could be affected by the explosion, bearing in mind that you were concerned about his life. MR GROBBELAAR: No, because that was the sign for Mr Rorich. The sign would be when Mr Mfalapitsa left the building and then he had to detonate the device. Therefore, he would not have been inside. MR TSHABALALA: I take it that you were the one who was checking whether he will be coming to you, he would be coming out of the room. MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that is so Chairperson that he would come to myself and Mr Rorich. MR TSHABALALA: And immediately when you saw him you gave an indication the Mfalapitsa is out of the room. MR GROBBELAAR: No he came directly to us and he was at us when the explosion took place. MR TSHABALALA: Did you indicate to Rorich that Mfalapitsa is going out of the room? MR GROBBELAAR: No, Mr Rorich saw it himself because we were together. MR TSHABALALA: Will you regard your actions at the moment as proportional to the political objectives which you were pursuing at the time? MR GROBBELAAR: I’m not following you. MR TSHABALALA: Will you regard your actions proportional to the political objectives you were pursuing at the time? MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, at that stage I saw it as just, but currently I do not agree with it. MR TSHABALALA: Even if the acts which they were alleged to be about to commit were not committed, you regarded it as proportional to your political objectives. MR GROBBELAAR: Yes, that is so. MR TSHABALALA: Did you know the ages of the people which were involved with Cosas, that is the Cosas Four, did you know their age at the time? MR GROBBELAAR: No, Chairperson. No I did not find out I just knew that it was young persons, but I did not know the ages of any of them. MR TSHABALALA: Did you know the type of weapons used when they were blown up? MR GROBBELAAR: No, Chairperson. MR TSHABALALA: No further questions. NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR TSHABALALA CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Mr Tshabalala. Ms Thabethe, any questions? MS THABETHE: No questions, Mr Chair. CHAIRPERSON: Mr Grobbelaar, what type of weapons were issued to members of the police like Mr Nkosi? MR GROBBELAAR: As far as I know they were issued with hand weapons, pistols and then in certain instances, I can speak of only the Soweto Region, but in certain instances where there was danger, they were issued with an R1 rifle. Excuse me, and with a twelve bore shotgun. MR GROBBELAAR: If radios were available they would be issued to some of the members, but this was a scarce article which was used more by the people who were on duty and had to move around. CHAIRPERSON: What other steps are taken to safeguard these members? Are visits paid to their houses Soweto? MR GROBBELAAR: An arrangement was made with the unrest unit to, during their shift, they would make a turn at these particular houses, because it did indeed happen that members who were on duty were very busy but during that time there was much I would not say unrest, but there were many attacks and many other complaints which they had to attend to, but when they had the opportunity the could visit their particular house. CHAIRPERSON: You say that at that stage you agreed with the actions but you do not now. CHAIRPERSON: What is the current position, why do you not agree with? MR GROBBELAAR: I as person, I speak for myself, I think things have changed entirely and I think this is the reason why I do not agree anymore. Firstly, it was not nice to be there and be present when somebody’s life was taken. It is another matter if it was self-defence and I think the current situation which reigns now is entirely different. It is entirely different from that time. CHAIRPERSON: You will not today kill four young persons. MR GROBBELAAR: That is correct, Chairperson, I wouldn’t. CHAIRPERSON: But you are convinced that you were right at that stage. MR GROBBELAAR: At that stage yes I was convinced that I was correct. CHAIRPERSON: So you have changed your opinion now with regard to the correctness of the action at that stage? MR GROBBELAAR: No, I regard my action at that time CHAIRPERSON: So you think you were justified in taking part in this operation? MR GROBBELAAR: That is correct, Chairperson. CHAIRPERSON: Did it not bother you that it was young people that you were killing? CHAIRPERSON: Did you ask your colleagues? MR GROBBELAAR: No I did not Chairperson. From which colleagues do you mean? CHAIRPERSON: It would seem that you had much contact with Coetzee. CHAIRPERSON: How did Coetzee convince you to participate in the killing of four young persons whom you did not know? MR GROBBELAAR: I accepted it because I would say he had already attempted to persuade them and when he went to Pretoria and received the instruction there and he came back and conveyed to me that this was the instruction, I then accepted that it was an instruction which came from a higher authority and there was no other solution. I trusted him that it would be so and that is why I accompanied him because he asked for my assistance. CHAIRPERSON: Did you realise that it was four youths whom apparently had no training in the handling of weapons and secondly, they were not in possession of any weapons. MR GROBBELAAR: I realised that but I was also aware Chairperson that there were of these young people who committed acts of terror. CHAIRPERSON: But you did not know these four? MR GROBBELAAR: No Chairperson. CHAIRPERSON: So you would not be in a position to judge whether they were indeed in that type of category? MR GROBBELAAR: No Chairperson. CHAIRPERSON: Is it not a very difficult thing to do, to kill young persons under those circumstances, nevermind the circumstances. MR GROBBELAAR: I agree with you completely Chairperson and this is something that stays with one and this was 17 years ago but it still remains with me. But when one asks for forgiveness and you ask for forgiveness for all your wrong deeds, and when one asks God to forgive you, He is the only entity who can forgive me, it helps a little, but it still bothers me. I would like to apologise the family and the other family members but this will not bring back these persons. I have to find peace within myself and if I cannot find that then I cannot continue. CHAIRPERSON: I understand what you say and that is why I ask you. What is of note is that no steps were taken to see if there was any method to save this situation without killing these people. MR GROBBELAAR: Chairperson you have to understand my position. I acted on what Mr Coetzee told me. I trusted him and I trusted what Mr Mfalapitsa told him and I was convinced that steps had been taken to avoid that these people would not continue with their plans, but these people came to a point, they said that we cannot wait any longer, we have to do something now. CHAIRPERSON: Very well, thank you Mr Grobbelaar. Mr Visser have you got any re-examination? MR VISSER: No re-examination that you Chairperson. I would like in the exceptional case of Mr Grobbelaar who tells me that he is in a lot of pain, ask for him to be excused. If its necessary for him to be recalled he can come back. CHAIRPERSON: No there can’t be any objection to that. Mr Grobbelaar we will excuse you from any other attendance at these hearings. MR GROBBELAAR: Thank you very much Chairperson. MR VISSER: That brings me to the end of my witnesses Chairperson. I’ll hand over to someone else. CHAIRPERSON: Thank you Mr Visser. Yes, I think in respect of this matter is it only your client that still remains in regard to this issue or what? |