SABC News | Sport | TV | Radio | Education | TV Licenses | Contact Us
 

Amnesty Hearings

Type AMNESTY HEARINGS

Starting Date 18 November 1999

Location PRETORIA

Day 4

Names JOHANNES JAKOBUS SWART

Back To Top
Click on the links below to view results for:
+sambo +sam

MR SIBANYONI: Your full names, Mr Swart.

JOHANNES JAKOBUS SWART: (sworn states)

MR SIBANYONI: Please be seated. Sworn in, Chairperson.

EXAMINATION BY MR CORNELIUS: Thank you, Mr Chair.

Mr Swart, you have handed up a proper application in terms of Section 18, and you were an employee as described in Section 20(2)(b) and Section 20(2)(f) of Act 34/95, is that correct?

MR SWART: That's correct, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: You were also a member of Vlakplaas, as prescribed, and you had the rank of Constable, is that correct?

MR SWART: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: You have already heard the evidence that was led here this morning, and at all times you acted within the scope of your duties in the execution of your instructions from Col de Kock, is that correct?

MR SWART: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: Did you bona fide believe that you acted against a political enemy of the country in the execution of your duties?

MR SWART: Yes, I did.

MR CORNELIUS: You knew the instruction or request came from Security.

MR SWART: That is correct.

MR CORNELIUS: You worked on a need-to-know basis at all stages and you did not put questions to Mr de Kock with regard to his instructions, is that correct?

MR SWART: That is correct.

MR CORNELIUS: Did you have any ill-feelings towards the victim, Sweet Sambo?

MR SWART: No, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: Except for your salary, did you receive any remuneration or reward for your services rendered?

MR SWART: Not at all.

MR CORNELIUS: Insofar as it has regard to the evidence of Klopper and Vermeulen, you confirm the contents of your application and you agree with their evidence, is that correct?

MR SWART: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: You apply here for amnesty for your participation as an accessory in a murder, defeating the ends of justice and possible transgressions of the Explosives Act, and delicts which might emanate from acts and/or omissions of this particular incident, is that correct?

MR SWART: That is correct, Chairperson.

MR CORNELIUS: Thank you, Mr Chair.

NO FURTHER QUESTIONS BY MR CORNELIUS

MR HATTINGH: I have no questions, thank you, Mr Chairman.

NO QUESTIONS BY MR HATTINGH

MR LAMEY: Thank you, Chairperson. I've got no questions, I just want to put on record there are certain minor differences about which vehicle, where they got each other. I'm not going to put that, thank you, Chairperson.

NO QUESTIONS BY MR LAMEY

CHAIRPERSON: I think we must bear in mind that we're talking of something nine years ago and for people to remember precisely who was in what car at what stage of the journey, is ... Right, questions?

MS LOCKHAT: No, thank you, Chairperson.

NO QUESTIONS BY MS LOCKHAT

MR CORNELIUS: That concludes our presentation, thank you, Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: I have one question I meant to put to your previous applicant, but I see he's left us.

MR CORNELIUS: He is available, Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: Is he? Well could you recall him for one moment.

MR CORNELIUS: Thank you, Mr Chair.

CHAIRPERSON: I've got no questions for this applicant.

MR CORNELIUS: I'll do so.

WITNESS EXCUSED

 
SABC Logo
Broadcasting for Total Citizen Empowerment
DMMA Logo
SABC © 2024
>