SABC News | Sport | TV | Radio | Education | TV Licenses | Contact Us
 

TRC Final Report

Page Number (Original) 172

Paragraph Numbers 11 to 16

Volume 5

Chapter 5

Subsection 1

International legal framework

11 The right of victims of human rights abuse to fair and adequate compensation is well established in international law. In the past three years, South Africa has signed a number of important international instruments, which place it under an obligation1 to provide victims of human rights abuse with fair and adequate compensation. The provisions of these instruments, together with the rulings of those bodies established to ensure compliance with them, indicate that it is not sufficient to award ‘token’ or nominal compensation to victims. The amount of reparation awarded must be sufficient to make a meaningful and substantial impact on their lives. In terms of United Nations Conventions, there is well established right of victims of human rights abuse to compensation for their losses and suffering. It is important that the reparation policy adopted by the government, based on recommendations made by the Commission is in accordance with South Africa’s international obligations. The reparation awarded to victims must be significant.

12 What follows is a brief review of international law in this regard.

1 Once a treaty has been signed, a country is obliged, according to article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, to ‘refrain from acts which would defeat the objects and purpose of such treaty’. South Africa is therefore bound by the provisions and jurisprudence of those treaties it has signed.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights2

13 Article 8 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights stipulates that:

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

14 The use of the words “effective remedy” underscores the point that the reparation awarded must be meaningful and substantial.

2 The Universal Declaration of Human Rights has been accepted as customary international law.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights3

15 Section 3(a) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights reads:

Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein recognised are violated shall have an effective remedy, notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity.

16 The Human Rights Committee established under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to consider alleged breaches of the Covenant has considered a number of cases relating to the right to compensation arising from gross violations of human rights.4 In all these cases, it has been held that, where the state or any of its agents is responsible for killings, torture, abductions or disappearances, it is under a legal obligation to pay compensation to the victims or their families. The fact that, in the majority of instances, the Committee has used the term ‘compensation’ implies that the award to victims should be substantial.

3 Signed by South Africa on 3 October 1994. 4 See Bleier v Uruguay (Case No. 30/1978); Camargo v Columbia (case No. 45/1979); Dermit v Uruguay (Case No. 84/1981); Quinteros v Uruguay (Case No. 107/1981); Baboerem v Suriname (Case Nos. 146/1983 & 148154/1983); Muiyo v Zaire (Case No. 194/1985). Scores more cases can be referred to. See generally the T Van Boven Study concerning the right to restitution, compensation and rehabilitation for victims of gross violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, (Report submitted to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, 2 July 1993).
 
SABC Logo
Broadcasting for Total Citizen Empowerment
DMMA Logo
SABC © 2024
>